14 Offers, one property: What is a home really worth?

• Fourteen written offers on one property ranged from R840,000 to R1.05 million, exposing a 25% difference in buyer valuations.
• Correct pricing can attract more qualified buyers, creating competition that allows the market, rather than the seller, to establish value.
• The highest offer is not always the best: price, finance, conditions and certainty of transfer all determine an offer’s real strength.

How much is a property really worth?

‍It is one of the most important questions in residential property and one of the most difficult to answer with absolute certainty.

Sellers have a price in mind. Estate agents analyse comparable transactions and competing listings. Banks employ professional valuers. Automated valuation models can generate estimates almost instantly. Buyers, meanwhile, make their own calculations based on affordability, location, condition and personal circumstances.

But ultimately, none of these determines market value in isolation. A recent residential sale handled by Simon Clark of wesellhouses.co.za illustrates just how wide the gap can be between what different buyers believe exactly the same property is worth. The property attracted 14 written offers.

• The lowest came in at R840,000.
• The two highest offers were both R1.05 million.
• That's a difference of R210,000 or 25% of the lowest offer, between genuine buyers willing to transact on the same property during the same marketing period.

So which buyer was right? In one sense, all of them were. Their offers reflected what that particular property was worth to them. But collectively, the 14 offers provided something much more valuable: evidence of where the market was prepared to transact.

‍

"One of the most misunderstood things about residential property is that value is not simply a number," says Clark. "It is a range and individual buyers can occupy very different positions within that range."

‍

The asking price is not the market value

‍One of the biggest mistakes sellers can make is assuming the asking price and market value are the same thing. They aren't.

An asking price is partly an estimate of value, but it is also a marketing decision designed to position a property in front of the right pool of potential purchasers. Agents can analyse recent comparable sales, current listings, location, property size, condition, market momentum and buyer demand to establish a realistic pricing range.

Banks and automated valuation models can provide further evidence. But none produces an infallible number. A property priced too aggressively can actually reduce its exposure by excluding buyers searching within lower online price brackets or causing prospective purchasers to dismiss it as poor value compared with competing properties.

By contrast, a well-positioned asking price can increase viewings and offers and potentially create the competitive tension required to achieve a stronger final selling price. That is precisely what happened in this case.

Fourteen buyers, fourteen different calculations

‍All 14 prospective purchasers were looking at the same physical asset. But economically and emotionally, they were not necessarily buying the same thing.

One buyer may have compared the property with another viewed the previous weekend. Another may have placed a premium on that particular suburb or street.

An investor could have approached the property through potential rental income, yield and renovation costs, while an owner-occupier might have been willing to pay more because the home perfectly suited their family's requirements.

Another buyer may simply have seen development or renovation potential that others overlooked. This helps explain how genuine offers on the same property could range from R840,000 to R1.05 million.

The lower offer wasn't necessarily irrational. Nor were the two buyers offering R1.05 million automatically overpaying. Each was making a different calculation based on their circumstances, alternatives, financial capacity and perception of value.

But when all 14 offers are considered together, a much clearer picture of demand begins to emerge. One buyer can provide an opinion. Fourteen competing buyers provide market evidence.

Why correct pricing doesn't mean selling cheaply

‍Some sellers still believe the safest route to securing a high selling price is to start with an even higher asking price. If the seller wants R1 million, for example, the temptation might be to advertise at R1.1 million and leave room for negotiation.

The problem is that buyers do not always behave that way. Most property searches now begin online, where buyers filter listings according to price, location and other criteria.

Price the property outside the range buyers regard as reasonable and some of the very purchasers who might have competed for it may never see it. Others may view the listing but reject it after comparing it with alternatives.

The result can be fewer viewings, fewer offers and weaker competition. Time then begins working against the seller. As a listing remains on the market, buyers start wondering why it hasn't sold. Eventually the price may be reduced, but the initial excitement surrounding a new listing has already disappeared.

Correct pricing attempts to achieve the opposite. It aims to maximise exposure to genuine purchasers while the property is fresh and allow competition between buyers, rather than an inflated asking price, to drive the result.

That does not mean deliberately under-pricing a property. It means positioning it at a level supported by market evidence.

Competition changes buyer behaviour

‍Multiple offers also introduce something that valuation models struggle to quantify: human psychology.

A buyer viewing a property without apparent competition has options. They can think overnight, organise another viewing, inspect competing properties or submit a lower offer and see how the seller responds.

Introduce several genuine competing purchasers and the calculation changes. The question moves from: "How cheaply can I buy this property?" to: "How much am I prepared to pay rather than lose it?" Those are fundamentally different decisions. Genuine scarcity can therefore change buyer behaviour.

This does not justify agents manufacturing urgency or falsely claiming competing offers exist. But where competition is real, the possibility of losing a desirable property becomes part of the buyer's calculation.

In Clark's example, two separate purchasers independently arrived at R1.05 million. Each effectively reached a point where offering more could no longer be justified, while offering less risked losing the property. That is genuine price discovery.

The highest offer isn't always the best

‍There is another important lesson from receiving 14 offers: sellers should not automatically accept the biggest number on the page. An offer consists of more than price.

A slightly lower cash offer could potentially carry less execution risk than a higher offer dependent on obtaining substantial mortgage finance. Similarly, a purchaser with bond pre-approval may provide greater certainty than someone who has not yet approached a lender. Other considerations can include:

• Deposit size and availability
• Mortgage finance conditions
• Sale-of-property conditions
• Occupational requirements
• Transfer timing
• Other suspensive conditions
• The overall probability of reaching successful transfer

The objective is therefore not necessarily to select the highest nominal offer. It is to identify the strongest combination of price, certainty and probability of successful transfer.

What this means for sellers

‍The lesson isn't that every correctly priced home will attract 14 offers. Nor should sellers automatically underprice properties in an attempt to manufacture a bidding war.

The lesson is simpler: price should be used strategically to expose a property to the largest credible pool of buyers at a level justified by the evidence. Then listen carefully to what the market says.

If viewings are scarce, that provides information. If numerous buyers view but nobody offers, that provides information. If several independent purchasers repeatedly offer below the asking price, that provides information.

And if 14 buyers compete for one property, with two independently reaching R1.05 million, that provides powerful information about the upper end of demonstrated demand. For sellers, the challenge is not to impose their preferred value on the market. It is to create the conditions in which the market can reveal what buyers are genuinely prepared to pay.

Market value is discovered, not declared

‍Property market value is often discussed as though there is one definitive number attached to every home. There isn't.

Comparable sales, professional valuations, market statistics and automated valuation models can all provide increasingly sophisticated estimates. An experienced estate agent can use these tools alongside local knowledge to determine a credible pricing range.

But the final test comes when the property meets actual buyers.

Clark's transaction produced offers stretching from R840,000 to R1.05 million a R210,000 spread on exactly the same home.

Fourteen buyers saw the same bricks and mortar but reached 14 individual conclusions about value. That is precisely why successful property marketing is about more than simply putting a price on a listing. It is about exposure, positioning, competition and price discovery.

For sellers, the most important lesson may therefore be counterintuitive: trying to dictate the highest possible asking price does not necessarily produce the highest possible selling price.

A properly priced property, exposed to enough genuine buyers, gives competition the opportunity to do something far more powerful. It allows the market to reveal what the property is really worth.

‍